Agents Slam Federal Insurance Regulation

|

NU Online News Service, Oct. 1, 4 :20p.m. EDT?The National Association of ProfessionalInsurance Agents said a survey showed that its members stronglysupport state regulation of insurance and oppose any effort to moveto a federal regulatory system.[@@]

|

Len Brevik, executive vice president and chief executive officerof PIA National, released the findings during an industry panelheld in Hershey, Pennsylvania.

|

"The results of our survey affirm that our members remain firmlysupportive of the current system of functional state insuranceregulation," said Mr. Brevik. "Participants were vehement in theirrejection of a federal insurance regulator. At the same time, amajority agreed that changes are needed to modernize stateinsurance regulation."

|

Of the approximate 400 PIA members responding to the e-mailsurvey, 96 percent said they were satisfied with their own state'sregulation and oversight practices; however only 41percentexpressed the same satisfaction with regulation and oversight innon-resident states where they transact business.

|

The survey was conducted Sept. 23 to 29. Percentages wererounded off.

|

A majority of respondents, 55 percent said changes are needed tomodernize state insurance regulation, while 44 percent said theythought everything is fine the way it is.

|

Eighty-four percent, said that having a federal insuranceregulator is a bad idea, and 88 percent expressed support forcontinuing the current system of functional state-based insuranceregulation "with only the most minimal federal oversight."

|

Regarding the proposed creation of a federal-level regulatorypanel to coordinate, but not mandate, greater efficiency in theinsurance marketplace as envisioned in draft legislation currentlypending in Congress, 39 percent said the panel is a bad idea and 16percent supported it. A majority, 51 percent, said such a panel isa "Trojan Horse" for federal regulation of insurance.

|

By a margin of 82 percent to 9 percent, respondents agreed withthe statement, "Federal regulation of insurance is only favored bya handful of large carriers and banks as a means of increasingtheir market share."

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

  • All PropertyCasualty360.com news coverage, best practices, and in-depth analysis.
  • Educational webcasts, resources from industry leaders, and informative newsletters.
  • Other award-winning websites including BenefitsPRO.com and ThinkAdvisor.com.
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.