Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
Though the court does not decide whether use of the two-way closed-circuit television or the Texas court's administration of an oath to a prosecution witness in Ohio actually violated the appellant's confrontation rights, the Court of Criminal Appeals' conclusion that these procedures did not violate appellant's Sixth Amendment rights was not contrary to and did not constitute an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law, as determined by the U.S. Supreme Court.
December 03, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
We are seeking an associate to join our Employee Benefits practice. Candidates should have three to six years of employee benefits experienc...
Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...
Duane Morris LLP has an immediate opening for a senior level, highly motivated litigation associate to join its dynamic and growing Employme...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS