There was a time in the United States — in the 1990s — when health maintenance organizations were the biggest thing in health care. Many hospitals and private practices were moving toward an HMO model of care, and it seemed as though the U.S. health care industry as a whole would shift to an HMO-driven system — which is how health care is deployed in Israel, a country that's been using HMOs as major care providers (and, later, the country's primary care provider) since before the Israeli state was even created.

The most obvious benefit of an HMO system is the coordination of care the organizations facilitate. There is a sophisticated level of communication that takes place between hospitals and practices; patient information is shared among care providers, so the surgeon in the hospital knows exactly what a patient's primary care provider has done for him or her in terms of tests and medication prescribed, and clinicians also have access to the patient's health history.

For a variety of reasons, HMOs did not become the savior of the U.S. health care system that some predicted — although one in particular, Kaiser Permanente, remains a popular care provider.

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.

  • Critical BenefitsPRO information including cutting edge post-reform success strategies, access to educational webcasts and videos, resources from industry leaders, and informative Newsletters.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM, BenefitsPRO magazine and BenefitsPRO.com events
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.