Oliver Wendell Homes Jr., forefather of judicial restraint, famously interrupted a lawyer pleading for justice before the Supreme Court, reminding counsel that he was seeking relief before a court of law, not a court of justice.

Justice Holmes' tenure on the bench ended well before Congress enacted ERISA in 1974. Since then ERISA cases have routinely found their way before the Supreme Court, proving Congress' ability to write laws that are clear, except when they are not. Searching for trends in past rulings to predict how the high court may now interpret ERISA is an exercise in shoveling smoke, and a temptation Thomas Clark strongly recommends against.

In a former life Clark was an associate at Schlichter, Bogard and Denton, a St. Louis boutique labor law firm at the forefront of a raft of class action ERISA litigation that has either been settled or is now groping its way through the appellate process. After half a decade in the weeds of some of the most contentious ERISA litigation of this era, Clark left the courtroom for FRA PlanTools, a web-based provider of fiduciary risk management solutions, where he counsels plan sponsors and administrators hoping to avoid the crosshairs he once trained on noncompliant fiduciaries.

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.

  • Critical BenefitsPRO information including cutting edge post-reform success strategies, access to educational webcasts and videos, resources from industry leaders, and informative Newsletters.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM, BenefitsPRO magazine and BenefitsPRO.com events
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.