ORLANDO-Orange County School Board may ask taxpayers this fall to support a half-penny increase in the 6% general sales tax to pay for $1.3 billion in major renovations to 130 schools.

Orange County taxpayers have rejected an increase in the 6% sales tax for 27 years.

School district staff is huddling with Orange County’s top executives to come up with a sales tax increase plan that could be voted in on the November ballot. They have two marketing plans. One would increase the sales tax to 6.5 cents on the dollar and bring in $1.4 billion by 2012 based on a 4% per-year projection increase.

The other program would couple a half-penny sales tax increase with a reduction in homeowners’ property taxes. This plan would reduce the property tax by 50 cents for every $1,000 of taxable property over a 15-year period.

For the homeowner, the plan would save $50 a year on the annual property tax after the basic $25,000 per year homestead exemption is taken. For the school board, the plan would raise $1.9 billion over 15 years.

Some of the schools needing repairs and renovations are 30 years old or older. Construction industry estimators intimate with the school district’s facilities management program tell GlobeSt.com on condition of anonymity it would be more cost effective to demolish the aging classrooms and construct new quarters.

For example, they contend, the average construction cost of a new elementary school is $11 million while 10 elementary schools on the repair list need $12 million or more to fix up. Eight middle schools require an average $15 million each to bring up to standard. Seven of the 10 high schools need an average $22 million worth of work, according to district staff estimates.

“Why in the world would any sane business person pour good money into a deteriorating asset when he could buy a comparable new asset for less than the repairs cost,” asks a construction company executive who requested anonymity.

Terry Adsit, the school district’s acting chief facilities officer, has similar thoughts. In a memo, Adsit says, “In many cases, the estimated cost to modernize and upgrade a school comes close to exceeding the replacement cost of the school.

“In situations like this, a more thorough evaluation is required to determine the best course of action for the district–that is, upgrade the school or reconstruct the school.”

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Unlimited access to GlobeSt and other free ALM publications
  • Access to 15 years of GlobeSt archives
  • Your choice of GlobeSt digital newsletters and over 70 others from popular sister publications
  • 1 free article* every 30 days across the ALM subscription network
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM events and publications

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

GlobeSt

Join GlobeSt

Don't miss crucial news and insights you need to make informed commercial real estate decisions. Join GlobeSt.com now!

  • Free unlimited access to GlobeSt.com's trusted and independent team of experts who provide commercial real estate owners, investors, developers, brokers and finance professionals with comprehensive coverage, analysis and best practices necessary to innovate and build business.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and GlobeSt events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com.

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join GlobeSt

Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.