A black man whose white co-worker was convicted of ethnic intimidation for slipping a noose around his neck may have no civil rights claim against his employer because the co-worker was not a supervisor, a federal judge in Pennsylvania ruled. U.S. District Judge Robert F. Kelly refused to grant summary judgment to the plaintiff on three of his claims.
March 13, 2000 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
A black man whose white co-worker was convicted of ethnic intimidation for slipping a noose around his neck may have no civil rights claim against his employer because the co-worker was not a supervisor, a federal judge has ruled.
In his 19-page opinion in Jackson v. T & N Van Service, U.S. District Judge Robert F. Kelly refused to grant summary judgment to the plaintiff on three of his claims — Section 1981, Title VII and the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
