There has been confusion as to the circumstances in which a defendant can obtain the costs protection offered by Civil Procedure Rule part 36. Abigail Healey looks into the reasons why the most recent decision may be good news for defendants
September 21, 2005 at 08:03 PM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legalweek
Last year, the Court of Appeal considered the circumstances in which a defendant can obtain the costs protection offered by Civil Procedure Rule (CPR) part 36, by making a written offer of settlement as opposed to making a payment into court.
This was in the context of a defendant public authority in Crouch v King’s Health-care.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
