In trying to divine what the U.S. Supreme Court might do when asked to step into Round Two of the Affordable Care Act battle, it’s only safe to say — as one academic put it — “All bets are off.”
Round One ended in 2012, when the justices, voting 5-4, upheld the constitutionality of the act’s individual mandate to buy insurance. Round Two is the conservative attack on an Internal Revenue Service rule interpreting the law’s subsidies for insurance bought on exchanges “established by the state” to include those established instead by the federal government.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
