The U.S. attorney general recently took pains to characterize an auto manufacturer’s alleged “defrauding the public” as not just a crime (a “crime,” by the way, recently invented by prosecutors rather than passed by the legislature), but as a “reprehensible” course of conduct. The crime the company had to admit, per the Justice Department: insufficient attention to what prosecutors — not auto-safety regulators — decided was a product defect related to automobile accelerators. Thousands of cars were voluntarily recalled to fix what has not even been established conclusively as a defect, let alone one that caused accidents. “Reprehensible.” Really?
Likewise, Associate Attorney General Tony West touts great prosecutorial success in using a civil statute designed to protect banks, and merely alleging — not proving — predicate crimes, to shake down financial institutions for huge penalties. The predicate crime alleged? Selling securities derived from toxic mortgages — mortgages that were written because government policies demanded a garage for every car, even if it meant shelling out mortgage money to clearly underqualified borrowers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
