The appellate court won't reconsider its standard for finding a case "exceptional."
April 15, 2014 at 04:05 PM
1 minute read
SAN FRANCISCO — The Ninth Circuit is the wrong place to bring a sketchy false-advertising case.
On Tuesday, the appellate court upheld a $934,000 award for attorney fees and costs in a Lanham Act case, declining to reconsider its friendly standard for finding a case “exceptional.”
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
